Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In accordance with paragraphs 5.20 and 5.21 of the Guide the PPC determined that the two applications should be considered together and in relation to each other.
The PPC accepted that should the establishment of a pharmacy be considered necessary or desirable it could only grant one of the applications.
The agreed criteria to be used to determine which application to grant were first, the range and quality of services for the local community, and second, location and accessibility, and third, all else being equal, the date of receipt of the application.
The PPC stated that it was satisfied that the establishment of a pharmacy was necessary in order to secure adequate provision of pharmaceutical services in the neighbourhood.
As to the first criterion concerning range and quality of services for the local community it was accepted that there was no distinction between the two applications.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.