Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
AND IN THE MATTER OF A DECISION OF THE BILLY WRIGHT INQUIRY PANEL MADE ON 9 OCTOBER 2006
(c) the level of any risk to the applicant that may arise through his/her name entering the public domain;
(e) the applicant's involvement in the matters under investigation, and whether there is a public interest in his/her name being known or not being known.
(b) the "further particulars" obtained by the panel from the PSNI in relation to
(c) the "further information" supplied by the PSNI on 28 September 2006, referred to in paragraph 5 of the panel's decision;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.