Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
The case originated in an application (no. 28002/95) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Turkish national, Tuna Tamer (“the applicant”), on 30 March 1995.
The applicant did not appoint a lawyer for his representation before the Court and the Turkish Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court.
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings brought against him contravened the reasonable time requirement and that his right to a fair trial has not been respected. Furthermore he complained under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention that he was tried twice for the same offence.
The case was transferred to the Court on 1 November 1998 by virtue of Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.