Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Marie Monnet for the Applicant James Gascoigne for the 1st Respondent Miles Parker for the 2nd Respondent Sarah Peart for the Child Hearing date : 11 February 2021 ____________________
The court is satisfied that at the time the applicant local authority commenced proceedings on 7th September 2020, the child P was at risk of suffering significant harm and the harm and likelihood of harm is attributable to the care likely to be given to him if an order were not made, not being what it is reasonable to expect a parent to give to him.
The categories of harm include physical harm and emotional harm and neglect, more particularly: -
a. (date edited) M was assaulted by F at her home following an argument. F is reported to have stamped all over her and stabbed her in the elbow causing significant injuries.
b. (date edited) F attended M's property with a knife which he then used to slash up most of the furniture in the property, M and P's belongings. F also smashed all the windows leaving the property uninhabitable due to the damage.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.