Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Appeal - EU trade mark -- Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed - Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law - Appeal not allowed to proceed)
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 25 November 2019,
NHS, Inc., established in Santa Cruz, California (United States), represented by P. Olson, advokat,
composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, Vice-President of the Court, P.G. Xuereb and A. Kumin (Rapporteur), Judges,
having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, M. Szpunar,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.