Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1]������� In this application the petitioner (to whom I shall refer, for ease of reference, as �the wife�) seeks Ancillary Relief pursuant to a summons dated 20 February 2008.�
[3]������� The parties were married on 24 July 1974.� There was a conflict of evidence as to the date of separation which I shall deal with shortly. A Decree Nisi was granted on 5 November 2007.� There are four children of the marriage, all of whom are aged over 18.
[4]������� The principal issue in the application before me was whether a history of domestic abuse could amount to conduct which it would be inequitable to disregard.�
[5]������� The principal assets which were the subject of the hearing were agreed to be :
(i) The former matrimonial home (valued on behalf of the wife at approximately �225,000 and on behalf of the husband at approximately �250,000). Neither party called valuation evidence and so I concluded that the value of the property lay at a midpoint between the two valuations ;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.