Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
MR SIMON BIRT KC (Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) ____________________
Mr William Harman (instructed by Cooke, Young & Keidan LLP) for the Claimant Ms Alison Potter (instructed by Spring Law Limited) for the Defendants Hearing date: 6 September 2022 ____________________
(1) On a proper construction of the IAA, the fee was to be collected from the Prospective Funder, and not from Agri.
(2) The Claimant is estopped from asserting that the fee is due from Agri (or the Defendants) pursuant to market convention, common assumption or representation to the effect that the fee would be paid by the Arrow Group and not by Agri.
(3) It is not admitted that FFL was a company related to Agri within the meaning of clauses 4 and 1.1 of the IAA. [1]
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.