Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
HIS HONOUR JUDGE CHARMAN (Sitting as a Judge of the High Court) ____________________
Mr Adam Porte (instructed by Tann Law Solicitors) for the Claimant Mr Justin Perring (instructed by Mascot Solicitors) for the Defendant Hearing dates: Hearing on 28 October and 26 November 2025; Written submissions dated 12 December 2025 for the Claimant and 24 December 2025 for the Defendant (Draft Judgment 19 January 2026) ____________________
"54. "The members submit to the jurisdiction of the court of the Country of England for the enforcement of this Agreement and for any arbitration award or decision arising from this Agreement.
If the dispute is not resolved within a reasonable period, then any or all outstanding issues may be submitted to mediation in accordance with any statutory rules of mediation. If mediation is not successful in resolving the entire dispute or is unavailable, any outstanding issues will be submitted to final and binding arbitration in accordance with the laws of the Country of England. The arbitrator's award will be final, and judgment may be entered upon it by any court having jurisdiction within the Country of England."
(a) the claim itself is defective as the Part 8 Claim form used to bring the claim does not comply with the relevant provisions of the CPR, so that the claim is invalid or should not be allowed to proceed or should be dismissed for that reason in any event.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.