Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President, Ksenija Turković, Aleš Pejchal, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Armen Harutyunyan, Jovan Ilievski, Gilberto Felici, judges, and Renata Degener , Deputy Section Registrar ,
A . Proceedings in respect of the rectification of the applicant ' s ethnicity , as recorded in the electoral roll
... [ T he Ministry ' s] decision is based on the State Judicial Council Act and the General Administrative Procedure Act ...
... [T] he court examined and rejected as ill-founded [the applicant ' s] allegations that the impugned decision had restricted his right to assert his own ethnic identity. In the present case, [the applicant] requested a rectification - that is to say the modification of his ethnicity entry in the electoral roll . [The Ministry ' s ] refusal [ to do so ] cannot be regarded as a restriction on his right to assert his ethnic identity , given that the modification in question was sought after the announcement of the election of [new] members to the SJC had been published. "
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.