Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The applicant by way of judicial review applied on the 14 th November, 2002, for an order in the following terms:
A declaration by way of application for judicial review that the decision of the respondent to proceed with the trial in the matter of the Director of Public Prosecutions -v- P. G. in the charge sheets 34646, 33374, 35297, 35297, 35294 and 35304, Bray Garda Station at Bray District Court was unjust and unfair for delay and contrary to the accused/applicant's constitutional right to a fair and expeditious trial.
An injunction by way of judicial review restraining the respondents from proceeding with the trial in the matter of the Director of Public Prosecutions -v- P. G. in the charge sheets 34646, 33374, 35297, 35297, 35294 and 35304, Bray Garda Station at Bray District Court on the 24th day of May, 2002.
A declaration by way of application for judicial review that the decisions of the respondents dated the 1st day of February, 2002, to proceed with the trial in the matter of the Director of Public Prosecutions -v- P. G. by way of trial at the District Court summarily on charge sheets 34646, 33374, 35297, 35297, 35294 and 35304 was made in breach of natural justice and constitutional justice and in breach of fair procedures and due process.
Such further and other order as to this Honourable Court shall deem fit and just.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.