Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 10 � Freedom of expression � Criminal conviction for publication of an article criticizing Islam � Right of religious people not to be insulted on grounds of their beliefs � Domestic courts� failure to justify qualification of impugned remarks as incitement to religious hatred � Domestic courts� failure to balance competing interests at stake � Severity of sanctions � Proportionality
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Angelika Nu�berger, President, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ��������� Ganna Yudkivska, ��������� S�ofra O�Leary, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� Lәtif H�seynov, ��������� Lado Chanturia, judges, ��������� and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 13274/08 ) against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by two Azerbaijani nationals, Mr Rafig Nazir oglu Tagiyev ( Rafiq Nəzir oğlu Tağıyev � �the first applicant�) and Mr Samir Sadagat oglu Huseynov ( Samir Sədaqət oğlu H�seynov � �the second applicant�) (�the applicants�), on 7 March 2008.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.