F v W. & Ors (Approved)

                  As appears from the Injunction Judgment:

a.        In 2015, the Banks appointed a receiver/agent over the Property;

b.       On 17 August 2023, the Plaintiff bought the Property from the Banks' successor in title, doing so in the knowledge that; (i) the Property was unlawfully occupied; (ii) the Receiver could not gain access; and (iii) the Occupants were refusing to identify themselves, to engage with the Receiver or to recognise his entitlements and were demanding payment of �146,475 on the basis that the Property had been the Defendant's home for a number of years;

c.        The Plaintiff established a very strong prima facie case that he would be likely to succeed at trial. He proved his title. As the registered owner, he is presumed to have good title. No evidence was adduced to impugn his title.

                  The Defendant did take various steps following the Injunction Hearing. However, the applications, affidavits, exhibits and other documents and submissions filed by him after the hearing were generally not relevant to the injunction application, except to the extent that they concerned the adverse possession claim.