Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 � Respect for private life � Positive obligations � Lack of effective investigation into allegations of sexual abuse over young child � Authorities� failure to engage in context-sensitive assessment of conflicting evidence
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Paul Lemmens, President, ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, ��������� Alena Pol�čkov�, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Gilberto Felici, ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 6318/17 ) against the Slovak Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Slovak national, Ms M.M.B. (�the applicant�), on 13 January 2017. The President of the Section acceded to the applicant�s request not to have her name disclosed (Rule 47 � 4 of the Rules of Court).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.