Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Transcript provided by: Posib Ltd, Y Gilfach, Ffordd y Pentre, Nercwys, Flintshire, CH7 4EL Official Transcribers to Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service DX26560 MOLD Tel: 01352 757273 Fax: 01352 757252 [email protected] www.posib.co.uk
Miss Acton for the Local Authority The First and Second Respondent were not represented and were litigants in person Children's Guardian was represented by a solicitor Ms Newman Hearing dates: 3rd March 2014 ____________________
The implication being there that if an actual contact had taken place, presumably A's reaction would have been even stronger.
So far as that heading 'Health Benefits' is concerned, that opinion of the medical therapeutic benefits is by no means put forward by a medical expert. Whilst I am prepared to accept the views expressed with regard to Islamic practice, the views of the Imam with regard to the medical benefits of the procedure are effectively the views of a lay person and not the views of an expert.
Mr Justice Baker dealt specifically with those matters more fully at paragraph 70 to 75 of his judgment, which I have summarised from the third heading of the headnote itself.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.