Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Erik M�se, President, ��������� Angelika Nu�berger, ��������� Andr� Potocki, ��������� Faris Vehabović, ��������� Yonko Grozev, ��������� Carlo Ranzoni, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, judges, and Milan Bla�ko, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in two applications (nos. 59752/13 and 66277/13) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by two German nationals, Mr Rolf Wolter (�the first applicant�) and Mr J�rgen Sarfert (�the second applicant�), on 18 September 2013 and 11 October 2013 respectively.
The first applicant was represented by Mr P. Krumbiegel, a lawyer practising in Cologne, and the second applicant by Mr F. Steinhoff, a lawyer practising in Lennestadt-Grevenbr�ck. The German Government (�the Government�) were represented by one of their Agents, Ms K. Behr, of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.