Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 1 P1 � Peaceful enjoyment of possessions � No �legitimate expectation� to restitution in kind � Lengthy unjustified delays in restitution proceedings in respect of agricultural land � Prolonged uncertainty as to exact scope of entitlement to restitution
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Angelika Nu�berger, President, ��������� Ganna Yudkivska, ��������� Yonko Grozev, ��������� S�ofra O�Leary, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� Lәtif H�seynov, ��������� Lado Chanturia, judges, and Milan Bla�ko, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 45806/11 ) against the Republic of Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a hundred and forty-seven Bulgarian nationals (�the applicants�) on 15 July 2011. Some of the applicants passed away after the lodging of the application and their heirs expressed a wish to continue the proceedings in their stead. A list of the applicants, indicating also the heirs of those of them who have passed away, is set out in the appendix.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.