Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Michael Nolan (instructed by Wikborg Rein LLP) for the Claimants Timothy Young QC (instructed by Winter Scott LLP) for the Defendants Hearing date: 24 November 2014 ____________________
The phrase "Delivery Date" was defined in Article VII to mean the date stated in that clause or "such later date to which delivery is extended pursuant to the terms of this Contract".
i) The delivery of the vessel was delayed beyond the "Delivery Date" (as defined in Article VII of the contract).
ii) The Buyer gave notice of cancellation of the contract on a date which was more than 270 days after the Delivery Date.
iii) Before such notice of cancellation was given, the Yard had not given notice to the Buyer of any delay which the Yard claimed had been caused by a breach of contract by the Buyer (or any other cause for which the Yard was not responsible).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.