Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 6 � 1 • Access to court • Unjustified discontinuation of the proceedings brought by the first applicant, with reference to the parallel proceedings brought by the second applicant
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Paul Lemmens, President, ��������� Helen Keller, ��������� Dmitry Dedov, ��������� Alena Pol�čkov�, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Gilberto Felici, ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges,
At different stages of the proceedings before the Court the applicants were represented by Mr F. Tishayev, Ms M. Agaltsova and other lawyers of the Human Rights Centre Memorial, Moscow, and the European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (EHRAC), United Kingdom.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.