Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
That the amended Statement of Claim served on 27 February 2003 be struck out under Order 18 Rule 19 on the grounds that it is �a)�scandalous, frivolous or vexatious; b) it may prejudice embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action; c) it is otherwise an abusive process of the Court;
Alternatively an Order staying the amended Statement of Claim under the inherent jurisdiction of the Court;
Further or in the alternative an Order pursuant to Order 33 Rule 3 that the legal rights of the plaintiff to claim for care and accommodation raised in the amended Statement of Claim be tried as a preliminary issue before trial of the action.
Article 7 of the 1972 Order makes provision for the recovery of certain charges. It provides �
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.