Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Transcribed by BEVERLEY F. NUNNERY & CO. (a trading name of Opus 2 International Limited) Official Court Reporters and Audio Transcribers 5 Chancery Lane, London EC4A 1BL Tel: 020 7831 5627 Fax: 020 7831 7737 [email protected]
A P P E A R A N C E S MISS F. WILEY QC (instructed by Setfords Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the Applicant (Father). THE FIRST RESPONDENT (Mother) was In Person but did not attend the hearing. MS. J. LONNEN (Solicitor, of Eskinazi & Co.) appeared on behalf of the Guardian. ____________________
The mother's non-attendance at the final hearing and deemed application for an adjournment .
When considering what is in the interests of a child's welfare the court shall have regard in particular to the factors set out in the welfare checklist in s.1(3). In this case the particularly important factors are: X's� wishes and feelings, his needs, the likely effect on him of any change in his circumstances, any characteristics which I�consider relevant and any harm he has suffered or is at risk of suffering, and the capacity of his parents to meet his needs.
She had alleged that the father had deliberately conducted the litigation in such a way as to cause her harm.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.