Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Robert Spano, President, ��������� Julia Laffranque, ��������� Işıl Karakaş, ��������� Neboj�a Vučinić, ��������� Paul Lemmens, ��������� Valeriu Griţco, ��������� Jon Fridrik Kj�lbro, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 81681/12 ) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by an Uzbek and Turkish national, Mr R.M. (�the applicant�), on 5 October 2012. The President of the Section acceded to the applicant�s request not to have his name disclosed (Rule 47 � 4 of the Rules of Court).
The applicant was represented by Mr A. Yılmaz, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.