Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Appeal - Bananas - Common organisation of the markets - Regulation (EC) No 478/95 - Export licence scheme - Action for damages - Proof of damage and causal link)
T. Port GmbH & Co. KG, established in Hamburg (Germany), represented by G. Meier, Rechtsanwalt,
appellant, APPEAL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fifth Chamber) of 1 February 2001 in Case T-1/99 T. Port v Commission [2001] ECR II-465 , seeking to have that judgment set aside in part, the other party to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities, represented by K.-D. Borchardt and M. Niejahr, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg, defendant at first instance, THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),
composed of: J.-P. Puissochet, President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), V. Skouris, F. Macken and N. Colneric, Judges, Advocate General: P. L�ger, Registrar: M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator,
'27 The applicant is an importer of fruit, established in Germany, and has for a long time traded in third-country bananas. It was a Category A operator. 28 At a date not specified by the applicant, it concluded contracts with producers in Costa Rica for the delivery of bananas which were to be marketed in the Community. It claims that it was obliged to that end to purchase export licences from that State.'
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.