Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Harding submitted that there were at all material times potential hypothetical owners and occupiers of the appeal property.
Because the date now agreed for the removal of the advertising hoardings, 20 July 2002, is earlier than 17 September 2002 Mr Harding submitted that the opportunity to argue for a reduced value did not exist. In the agreed statement of facts the parties stated that the case would be remitted to the VT if neither 1 January 2001 nor 20 July 2002 were found by the Tribunal to be the correct date for the deletion of the entry from the list. Since one of these dates has now been found to be correct the case should not be remitted.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.