Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[1]������� This case arises in the context of repossession proceedings which began some 15 years ago in relation to a property at 196 Bush Road, Dungannon, belonging to the first and second named defendants Mr and Mrs Quinn.� The history of the case is set out in the judgment of McBride J delivered on the 28 June 2018.� This was affirmed by the Court of Appeal in a judgment reported at [2019] NICA 60 .
[3]������� As the defendants fell into arrears on the mortgage repayments court proceedings ensued.� On 6 December 2006 an originating summons was issued by the plaintiff mortgagee seeking repossession of the property due to default of the mortgage payments pursuant to Order 88 of the Rules of the Court of Judicature (Northern Ireland) 1980.� That application was granted.
[4]������� This appeal is concerned with the subsequent refusal of the High Court to grant a stay of enforcement of the repossession order. �That decision came after a long line of court hearings which we summarise below.
[5]������ (i)������� On 18 June 2007 Master Ellison made an order for possession in relation to the property but ordered that it would not be enforced without leave whilst the defendants paid a sum of �1,600 per month to cover arrears and ongoing monthly instalments.
(ii)������ On 8 March 2013 the plaintiff applied for leave to enforce the possession order made on 18 June 2007 on the ground of the defendants default in making payments.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.