Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The wife was represented by Mr Ken Collins (Counsel, acting on a Direct Access basis).
The husband was represented by Mr Simon Sugar (Counsel, instructed by OGR Stock Denton, Solicitors).
     This case concerns the financial remedies proceedings arising out of the divorce between P (to whom I shall refer as �the wife�) and Q (to whom I shall refer as �the husband�).
     The case proceeded to a final hearing over four days on 7 th , 8 th , 9 th and 10 th February 2022.
     The court was presented with two electronic bundles running to a combined total of more than 600 pages and a number of other documents have been exchanged during the final hearing. I have considered all the documents presented to me, in particular I have considered:-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.