Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 21 — Communication by telephone — Operation of a telephone line by a trader to enable consumers to contact him in relation to a contract concluded — Prohibition on applying a rate higher than the basic rate — Concept of ‘basic rate’)
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Regional Court, Stuttgart (Germany)), made by decision of 15 October 2015, received at the Court on 5 November 2015, in the proceedings
composed of A. Prechal (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, C. Toader and E. Jarašiūnas, Judges,
– Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV, by M. Ross and M. Hammer, Rechtsanwälte,
– the Lithuanian Government, by D. Kriaučiūnas and K. Mickutė, acting as Agents,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.