Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Luis L�pez Guerra, President, ��������� Dmitry Dedov, ��������� Jolien Schukking, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in six applications (nos. 31189/15, 49973/15, 54813/15, 55625/15, 38250/16 and 40014/16) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by Uzbek nationals (�the applicants�) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
The applicants were represented by various lawyers practising in Moscow, as indicated in the appended table. The Russian Government (�the Government�) were represented initially by Mr G. Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr M. Galperin.
On 23 August 2016 the International Commission of Jurists was granted leave to intervene as a third party in the case of S.U. v. Russia , no. 55625/15 under Rule 44 � 3 of the Rules of Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.