Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
III. Procedure before the General Court ruling after the case had been referred back and the judgment under appeal
( Appeal - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Termination of the contract - Article 47(c)(i) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Incompetence - Conduct in the service and attitude at work incompatible with the interests of the service - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Right to parental leave - Article 42a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union )
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 29 August 2023,
European Commission, represented initially by I. Melo Sampaio and A. Sauka, acting as Agents, and subsequently by A. Sauka, acting as Agent,
composed of F. Biltgen, President of the First Chamber, acting as President of the Seventh Chamber, M.L. Arastey Sahún (Rapporteur), President of the Fifth Chamber, and J. Passer, Judges,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.