Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
NOTE: There must be no reporting of the first three appellants' names: s 1 Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992.
LORD JUSTICE HUGHES VICE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION MR JUSTICE OWEN and MRS JUSTICE THIRLWALL DBE ____________________
Mr C H Blaxland QC and Miss M Brewer (instructed by Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the Appellants LM, DG & MB Mr J Lamb (instructed by Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the Appellants Tabot and Tijani Mr P Wright QC and Mr T J Storrie (instructed by The Crown Prosecution Service for the Crown > Hearing dates : 6th October 2010 ____________________
i) Article 10 requires States to provide means by which trained personnel are made available to identify and assist victims. It creates a positive duty to adopt measures to this end.
ii) Further, and most importantly for present purposes, Article 26 provides as follows under the heading "Non-punishment Provision":
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.