Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Andr�s Saj�, President, ��������� Vincent A. De Gaetano, ��������� Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, ��������� Krzysztof Wojtyczek, ��������� Egidijus Kūris, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ��������� Marko Bo�njak, judges, and Marialena Tsirli, Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 55894/13 ) against the Republic of Lithuania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Ukrainian national, Mr Maryan Yusiv (�the applicant�), on 26 August 2013.
The applicant was represented by Ms D. Vi�inskienė, a lawyer practising in Kaunas. The Lithuanian Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent, Ms K. Bubnytė .
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.