Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
� On 1/7/08 at Luton in the County of Bedfordshire used threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour or disorderly behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress and the offence was racially aggravated in accordance with section 28 Crime and Disorder Act 1998 contrary to S5 Public Order Act 1986 and S31(1)(c ) and (5) Crime and Disorder Act 1998�
�� "If The Tribunal hearing the appeal comes to the view that the sanction imposed by the Conduct Committee is not the sanction that they as an expert tribunal would have imposed are they entitled, having come to that view, to allow the appeal despite the potential consequences in a case where the facts founding the misconduct are not in dispute?
�(1) An appeal against a decision of a Council under this Part in. respect of registration shall lie to the Tribunal.
(2) On an appeal against a decision, the Tribunal may confirm the decision or direct that it shall not have effect.
(a) to vary any condition for the time being in force in respect of the person to whom the appeal relates;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.