Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Georgios A. Serghides, President, ��������� Branko Lubarda, ��������� Erik Wennerstr�m, judges,
The case originated in five applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on the various dates indicated in the appended table. The application numbers and the applicants� personal details are also listed in the appended table.
The applicants were represented by the various NGOs indicated in the appended table. The Russian Government (�the Government�) were represented initially by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr M. Galperin.
On various dates notice of the applications was given to the Government. In Nakani (no. 10229/10 ) and Rashidov (no. 22751/10 ) the Court also gave notice of the applications to the Government in accordance with Rule 40 of the Rules of Court, on 23 February and 26 April 2010 respectively. The first application was granted priority treatment under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court on 3 June 2010.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.