Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Khanlar Hajiyev, President, ��������� Erik M�se, ��������� Dmitry Dedov, judges, and S�ren Prebensen, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in five applications (nos. 20696/06 , 22504/06, 41167/06, 6193/07 and 18589/07) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by five Russian nationals. The application numbers, the dates of lodging the applications and the dates of their communication, the applicants� names, their personal details and the names of their legal representatives as well as the information as to the relevant domestic judgments are set out in Appendix below.
The Russian Government (�the Government�) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin, Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.
The applicants each alleged that they had been convicted of drug offences following entrapment by the police in violation of Article 6 of the Convention. Mr Nikitin (application no. 41167/06 ) also complained under Article 6 � 3 (d) that he had not been able to examine the witness against him.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.