Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 6 � 3 (c) • Informal questioning of intoxicated applicant after arrest, without a lawyer and without sufficiently apprising him of his defence rights • Applicant�s statements noted in official note by a questioning officer and not in a formal record as per domestic law • Reliance by domestic courts on statements made at that stage in findings of guilt • Existing procedural guarantees insufficient in case circumstances • Criminal proceedings as a whole not considered as fair
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Marko Bo�njak , President , ��������� Krzysztof Wojtyczek, ��������� Alena Pol�čkov�, ��������� Ivana Jelić, ��������� Gilberto Felici, ��������� Erik Wennerstr�m, ��������� Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Liv Tigerstedt, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 47834/19) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Polish national, Mr Przemysław Lalik (�the applicant�), on 28 August 2019;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.