Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 2 (procedural) • Effective investigation • Death after police intervention to arrest fleeing suspect • Failure to provide clear answers to the circumstances surrounding the use of force, origin and consequences of injuries, and any causal link between the force used and the death, despite eyewitness testimonies and forensic evidence
Art 2 (substantive) • Necessity and proportionality of the use of force • Highly probable incidence of pre-existing medical condition of the deceased • Circumstances not sufficiently reliable and objective, preventing the Court from making a reliable assessment (of whether the actions of the police officers were Article 2 compliant) • No delay in the provision of medical care
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Ksenija Turković, President, ��������� Krzysztof Wojtyczek, ��������� Ale� Pejchal, ��������� Pauliine Koskelo, ��������� Tim Eicke, ��������� Jovan Ilievski, ��������� Raffaele Sabato, judges, and Abel Campos, Section Registrar,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.