Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
. On 8 April 2004 the applicant initiated civil proceedings for protection of his personality rights ("the main proceedings") against the Czech Republic in the person of the Ministry of Justice (no. 37 C 51/2004). On 28 March 2008 the Prague Municipal Court ( městský soud ) dismissed the applicant's action. The Prague High Court ( vrchní soud ) dismissed an appeal by the applicant on 20 October 2008 and the Supreme Court ( Nejvyšší soud ) dismissed an appeal on points of law on 15 April 2010.
. On 12 August 2013 the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal on points of law by the applicant, stating, inter alia :
"The Supreme Court pointed out in its previous cassation judgment in this case that, without providing any further reasons, it cannot be concluded that the fact that a plaintiff has initiated a large number of disputes ... means that the presumption of non-pecuniary damage caused by excessively long proceedings has been rebutted.
. On 24 April 2014 the Constitutional Court ( Ústavní soud ) dismissed a constitutional complaint ( ústavní stížnost ) by the applicant.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.