Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Unapproved ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� �No redactions needed
Donnelly J.���������������������������� ��������� Neutral Citation Number [2024] IECA 114
Preliminary observation about the standard of appellate review in a case such as this
             In B.B. (in which I delivered a judgment with which Whelan J and Haughton J agreed), the judgment contains at paras 56-58 a discussion of �the standard of appellate review in a case such as this and I do not propose to repeat those remarks save to say that this Court must have the relevant parameters firmly in view when conducting an analysis of the High Court judgment which itself was assessing the Ministerial decision according to standards of judicial review.
             As the issue of the first appellant's financial situation was a significant issue in this appeal, it may be helpful to set out certain relevant provisions of the Policy Document:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.