Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Family life • No shortcomings in authorities� decision to place child for adoption without the biological mother�s consent • Decision based on child�s best interests • Domestic authorities not responsible for the breaking of family ties and bond between mother and child • Margin of appreciation not overstepped • Possibility for mother to participate in decision-making process • Annulment of adoption placement possible, in principle, if a change in circumstances
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Pere Pastor Vilanova , President , ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Yonko Grozev, ��������� Jolien Schukking, ��������� Peeter Roosma, ��������� Ioannis Ktistakis, ��������� Andreas Z�nd , judges , and Milan Bla�ko, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 48321/20 ) against the Republic of Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by two Bulgarian nationals, Ms V.Y.R. and Ms A.V.R. (�the applicants�), on 26 October 2020;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.