Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Sara Anning for the Local Authority John Barnes for the 1st Respondent Mandy Arkell for the 2nd Respondent Amanda Steele for the 3rd Respondent Hearing dates: 25 - 26 April 2016 ____________________
A. The threshold criteria are satisfied as per the schedule of findings found by the court in satisfaction of the threshold criteria pursuant to s 31(2) on 24 October 2014, protective measures having been continuously in place since 23 May 2014.
B. The risks identified in the threshold criteria dated 24 October 2014 continued as at 27 January 2016 when the Local Authority issued its application for a care order, given that the following facts are proved;
C. The parents are unable to prioritise consistently and provide for J's needs due to their :
D. By reason of the above J is likely to suffer significant emotional and physical harm.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.