Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This hearing relates to the Petitioner's application for ancillary financial relief in divorce proceedings.
The Petitioner applied on 16 th December, 2019 for orders relating to child and spousal maintenance, including interim maintenance and secured provision, also for a lump sum order.
At the date of the hearing, the petitioner is seeking orders for child maintenance and a lump sum only.
The petitioner filed and served a position statement dated 8 th June, 2020, in anticipation of the final hearing, in this document she asks that the court attach a wage arrest to any order for maintenance and also an order that the respondent pay her costs on an indemnity basis.
The parties married on in 2015. The parties have 4 children together: Child 1 born in 2012; Child 2 born in 2013; Child 3 born in 2014; Child 4 born in 2016. The parties separated on in 2019. During the marriage the parties were provided with low-cost accommodation, comprising 5 bedroomed accommodation at the home of the petitioner's parents. Since separation the petitioner and the children have remained living with the petitioner's parents, the petitioner has no plans to move from this accommodation. Since separation, the petitioner's parents have provided financial support to the petitioner.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.