Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
I am concerned with two children: L aged seven and D presently aged three.� They appear through the children's guardian, PW, and are represented by Mr Carlen.
The local authority have made applications for public law orders in respect of the children and they are represented by Miss Freeman.
There is no appearance by the father of D, F, , and I will say more about him later in this judgment.� He will be referred to as �the father�.
The father of L is PC; he has played no part in her life after she was but a few weeks old and has played no part in these proceedings.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.