Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Transcript of a recording by Ubiqus 291-299 Borough High Street, London SE1 1JG Tel: 020 7269 0370 [email protected]
THE APPLICANT appeared In Person MS A VAN-DER-HAER appeared on behalf of the Respondent MS HOWE appeared on behalf of the Child through the Guardian ____________________
The mother has made an application for a section 91(14) order in respect of any future applications to be made by the father.
At his sentencing hearing, the mother addressed the father directly, and said this:
This provision was considered by the House of Lords in the case of Hunter v Chief Constable West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 . At page 544, Lord Diplock said this:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.