Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr Deepak Nagpal QC instructed by Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP for the applicant Mr Richard Castle instructed by Vaitilingam Kay Ltd Solicitors for the respondent Hearing date: 21 st October 2021 ________________________
(1) should I order the respondent husband to increase his voluntary payments of �1,000 pm to �3,700 pm, in addition to his payment of nursery fees and health cover; and
(2) should I make a costs allowance in the total amount of �49,500 plus VAT to cover W�s legal costs up to FDR? ������
(i)                  the agreed time estimate was grossly underestimated;
(ii)               the parties� witness statements for these applications were too long and too densely detailed;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.