Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Possibility for the referring court to take account of the preliminary ruling of the Court - Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment - Independence of the judiciary - Conditions for the appointment of judges of the ordinary courts - Possibility of challenging an order which has definitively ruled on a request for the grant of preventative measures - Possibility of removing a judge from a panel of judges of the court - Inadmissibility of the requests for a preliminary ruling)
REQUESTS for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Sąd Okręgowy w Katowicach (Regional Court, Katowice, Poland) and from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie (Regional Court, Kraków, Poland), made by decisions of 18 March 2021 and 31 March 2021, received at the Court on 23 March 2021 and 27 April 2021 respectively, in the proceedings
composed of K. Lenaerts, President, L. Bay Larsen, Vice-President, A. Arabadjiev, A. Prechal, E. Regan, N. Piçarra, Z. Csehi and O. Spineanu-Matei, Presidents of Chambers, M. Ilešič, L.S. Rossi, I. Jarukaitis (Rapporteur), A. Kumin, N. Jääskinen, I. Ziemele and J. Passer, Judges,
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 29 June 2022,
– the Prokuratura Okręgowa w Katowicach and the Prokuratura Okręgowa w Krakowie, by R. Babiński, S. Bańko, A. Reczka, B. Szyprowski and E. Tkaczewska-Kuk,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.