Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Neboj�a Vučinić, President, ��������� Paul Lemmens, ��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
Mr Uğurlu was represented before the Court by Mr E. Pekcan, a lawyer practising in Kocaeli. Ms �alışkan was represented by Mr İ. Bazan, a lawyer practicing in Istanbul. Mr N. Siyamoğlu, Mr T. Siyamoğlu, Ms Baskak, Mr C. D�zg�nsıvacı and Mr S. D�zg�nsıvacı were represented by Ms N. Şentuna, a lawyer practicing in İzmir. Ms �zalp was represented by Ms J. Kapıdere, a lawyer practicing in İzmir.
The applicants are Turkish nationals, whose dates of birth and places of residence are shown in the appendix. They all own plots of land located in different cities of Turkey.
Following local land development plans, the applicants� plots of land were designated for public use. Subsequently, complaining about the decrease in the market value of the land and the long-term uncertainty about the fate of their plots of land, the applicants initiated compensation proceedings before the civil courts.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.