Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Julia Laffranque, President, ��������� Jon Fridrik Kj�lbro, ��������� St�phanie Mourou-Vikstr�m, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in four applications (nos. 54957/09 , 14242/10, 22161/10 and 53804/11) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by four Turkish nationals, Mr Bur�in Yumuşak, Mr Kasım Artun� Kavalalı, Mr Emre Kırg�z and Mr G�rcan G�rsoy (�the applicants�), whose details are set out in the appendix.
On 22 September 2015 the complaints concerning the alleged independence and impartiality of the Supreme Military Administrative Court, the fairness of the proceedings before that court on account of the applicants� inability to access the classified documents submitted by the Ministry of Defence, and the non-communication of the written opinion of the public prosecutor were communicated to the Government and the remainder of the applications was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 � 3 of the Rules of Court.
The Government objected to the examination of the application by a Committee. After having considered the Government�s objection, the Court rejects it.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.