Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.2 By order of the High Court (� Caoimh J.) dated 11 th February, 2002 the applicant was given leave to apply for judicial review for such relief on the grounds following:
Mr. Robert Eagar, a solicitor in the firm of Garrett Sheehan & Co., having carriage of the proceedings on behalf of the applicant, verified the facts stated in the application and distinguished between the two prosecutions.
There were two books of evidence. The first, dated 10 th April, 2001, was in relation to the Central Criminal Court and the second, dated 29 th May, 2001, was in relation to the Circuit Court proceedings.
The deponent says that the applicant had instructed him that he was pleading not guilty and was contesting the allegations made against him.
He analysed the charge sheets. The applicant's niece made no formal complaint before 1999 and then made three statements of complaint to the Garda� in 2000, on 19 th February, 5 th June and 29 th November. The third statement clarified the dates upon which she alleged certain events had taken place.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.