Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I am asked to determine an application to vary an order for periodical payments payable to a mother for the benefit of HH. F (the "Father") represents himself. This is his application. He told the Court that he could not afford legal representation.
G (the "Mother") resists the application. She was represented at the hearing by Counsel. I am grateful for Advocate Davies' assistance in preparing the bundle for the final hearing.
HH's parents were married in 2005, a year or so before the child was born but, sadly, their marriage came to an end in 2010. They entered into a separation agreement in 2012 which was approved and set out in an Act of Court made by a former Registrar of the Family Division in March 2017.
That agreement, as recorded by the A ct of Court provided, amongst other things, that HH would share HH's time between the parents and that the Father would make periodical payments to HH's mother as follows: -
(i) £415 per month to include his contribution towards HH's school uniform and any extracurricular activities. This payment was to increase in line with any annual increase in the Jersey retail prices index ("RPI"); and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.