Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Private life • Correspondence • Inspection of a lawyer's documents by prison staff before and after meeting his client in prison in the absence of any suspicion of wrongdoing • Domestic provisions of a general nature with no distinction between inmates' lawyers and other visitors, in disregard of the special status of lawyers in the administration of justice • Lack of a clear and detailed framework or safeguards against possible abuse or arbitrariness • Interference not "in accordance with the law"
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Marko Bošnjak , President , Alena Poláčková, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Lətif Hüseynov, Ivana Jelić, Gilberto Felici, Erik Wennerström , judges , and Ilse Freiwirth, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 8826/20 ) against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by an Azerbaijani national, Mr Fariz Mubariz oglu Namazli ( Fariz Mübariz oğlu Namazlı - "the applicant"), on 30 January 2020;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.