Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 5 § 3 • Excessive length of applicant's pre-trial detention amounting to over six years • Domestic courts' reliance on grounds that could not be regarded as "sufficient" to justify entire duration of detention
Art 34 • Victim • Respondent State discharged procedural obligation under Art 3 to conduct effective investigation into allegations of abuse of power by a prison officer in the context of a relationship of dependence, as a consequence of which the applicant became pregnant in detention • Applicant's failure to provide information as to why compensation was never sought for breach of personal rights in connection with ill-treatment complained of • Victim status lost
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Marko Bošnjak , President , Alena Poláčková, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, Lətif Hüseynov, Péter Paczolay, Ivana Jelić, Gilberto Felici , judges , and Liv Tigerstedt, Deputy Section Registrar,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.